Preliminary Aboriginal Heritage Test
Clarifying When a CHMP Is Required in Victoria
In Victoria, Section 49B and 49C of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (as amended) introduces the Preliminary Aboriginal Heritage Test (PAHT).
This new instrument has been created as a means of formally determining whether a proposed activity requires the preparation of a cultural heritage management plan or not under the Victorian Aboriginal heritage regime.
The PAHT attempts to remove ambiguity from the process of determining whether a CHMP is required for an activity. Previously, even when there has been some doubt, the relevant council may have accepted a planning application without a CHMP if they were satisfied one wasn’t required. This position was usually supported by some form of due diligence assessment by a Heritage Advisor which determined that a CHMP was not required. The due diligence assessment process has been unregulated since 2006, resulting in the production of assessments of varying quality and veracity.
The PAHT effectively removes the onus from council of making any decisions based on unregulated assessments (regardless of the veracity or quality of those assessments) and allows the council to ‘push’ the decision on to Aboriginal Victoria via the undertaking a PAHT.
Why Choose ACHM
Experienced Team
Our senior native title anthropologists bring decades of expertise to every project.
Nationwide Reach
From urban developments to remote communities, we operate across Australia.
Reputation of Excellence
Trusted by clients for our professionalism, accuracy, and commitment to cultural preservation.
Let’s Get Your Project Started
How we do it
The requirements for a PAHT are essentially the same as those for a ‘Desktop CHMP’ therefore the PAHT will need to be prepared by a registered Heritage Advisor to the same standards as a CHMP. The costs associated with the preparation of a PAHT will most likely be commensurate with those of a Desktop CHMP. The PAHT will need to be submitted to the regulator (Aboriginal Victoria) for certification. The application for certification must be in the prescribed form and accompanied by the prescribed fee.
Aboriginal Victoria has 21 days from the receipt of the PAHT to certify that a CHMP is required or not. Requests for more information may extend this time. Failure to supply the required information to the required standards or within the time frame given by Aboriginal Victoria may result in the application for certification of the PAHT lapsing.
If the PAHT finds that a CHMP is required, and Aboriginal Victoria certify that to be correct, then a CHMP will become mandatory for that activity (Section 46 (e)).
Case Studies
Testimonials
Sector Manager | Millar Merrigan
ACHM has consistently provided us with expert advice on Aboriginal cultural heritage matters, including the preparation of Cultural Heritage Management Plans. They’re great to work with—professional, competitively priced, and reliable in meeting timeframes. Their practical approach and responsiveness make them a valued partner on our projects.
Chief Executive Officer | Banjima Native Title Aboriginal Corporation
ACHM are engaged extensively across Banjima Country and they provide exceptional expertise, professionalism, customer service and a genuine passion for preserving and promoting cultural heritage. ACHM goes beyond mere consultancy through consistently delivering professional services, solutions and best practice in every thing they do.
Senior Development Manager | Dav Consulting
We recently engaged ACHM to manage extensive Cultural Heritage Artefact Salvage Operations for an expansive and complex greenfields development site on north side of Melbourne. The diligence, open communication, efficiency and positive outcomes achieved by the ACHM Team, including in their coordination and management of the local RAP, was first class, and made my job as Development Manager substantially easier. Cannot recommend highly enough
Senior Development Manager | Avid
I have been a client of ACHM for over a decade and have engaged their services across four large-scale projects. Throughout this time, their dedication and professionalism have remained consistently impressive. ACHM excels at managing client expectations while operating sensitively within complex environments. They are highly skilled at guiding clients through cultural heritage approval processes, striking the delicate balance between client priorities and cultural sensitivities. I highly recommend ACHM for their expertise and commitment.
ABIGroup
We wish to thank yourself, Erica Walther and Shaun Canning who have at all times been professional, free to discuss potential options and provide feedback on the status of the Cultural Heritage Management Plans. We have found the ACHM team to be knowledgeable and very easy to deal with.
Environmental Coordinator, GMW Connections Project
ACHM have provided us with numerous due diligence assessments and Cultural Heritage Management Plans to both standard and complex level. They approach their scope with our project timeframes and budgets in mind, and I know I can rely on them to get the best outcome for these projects. ACHM provide pragmatic staff with great traditional owner relationships allowing for quick turnaround times.
Sector Manager | Millar Merrigan
ACHM has consistently provided us with expert advice on Aboriginal cultural heritage matters, including the preparation of Cultural Heritage Management Plans. They’re great to work with—professional, competitively priced, and reliable in meeting timeframes. Their practical approach and responsiveness make them a valued partner on our projects.
Chief Executive Officer | Banjima Native Title Aboriginal Corporation
ACHM are engaged extensively across Banjima Country and they provide exceptional expertise, professionalism, customer service and a genuine passion for preserving and promoting cultural heritage. ACHM goes beyond mere consultancy through consistently delivering professional services, solutions and best practice in every thing they do.
Senior Development Manager | Dav Consulting
We recently engaged ACHM to manage extensive Cultural Heritage Artefact Salvage Operations for an expansive and complex greenfields development site on north side of Melbourne. The diligence, open communication, efficiency and positive outcomes achieved by the ACHM Team, including in their coordination and management of the local RAP, was first class, and made my job as Development Manager substantially easier. Cannot recommend highly enough
Senior Development Manager | Avid
I have been a client of ACHM for over a decade and have engaged their services across four large-scale projects. Throughout this time, their dedication and professionalism have remained consistently impressive. ACHM excels at managing client expectations while operating sensitively within complex environments. They are highly skilled at guiding clients through cultural heritage approval processes, striking the delicate balance between client priorities and cultural sensitivities. I highly recommend ACHM for their expertise and commitment.
ABIGroup
We wish to thank yourself, Erica Walther and Shaun Canning who have at all times been professional, free to discuss potential options and provide feedback on the status of the Cultural Heritage Management Plans. We have found the ACHM team to be knowledgeable and very easy to deal with.
Environmental Coordinator, GMW Connections Project
ACHM have provided us with numerous due diligence assessments and Cultural Heritage Management Plans to both standard and complex level. They approach their scope with our project timeframes and budgets in mind, and I know I can rely on them to get the best outcome for these projects. ACHM provide pragmatic staff with great traditional owner relationships allowing for quick turnaround times.
Frequently Asked Questions
When should a PAHT be undertaken?
Sponsors are expected to exercise due diligence in determining their requirements under the Act and the Regulations with regard to proposed activities. A sponsor may engage a heritage advisor to prepare a due diligence assessment to establish whether an approved CHMP is mandatory for a proposed activity. The responsible authority may then choose to accept the conclusions of the due diligence assessment when deciding whether a statutory authorisation can be issued.
A PAHT should not be prepared in instances where a due diligence assessment clearly establishes a sponsor’s legislative requirements for a proposed activity. However, should a sponsor be unsure of their requirements and seek certainty, the preparation and submission of a PAHT for certification may be appropriate.
Will the amendment mean councils can demand PAHTs for all relevant permit applications as a matter of policy?
PAHTs are voluntary, and should only be undertaken if it is unclear as to whether a CHMP is required for proposed activity. Under the Act, a responsible authority (such as a Local Government Authority) cannot insist a PAHT be prepared before a statutory authorisation is issued for a proposed activity.
A fee applies for a PAHT to be undertaken.
Who can prepare a PAHT?
A PAHT can be undertaken by any person who is seeking to determine whether a CHMP is required for a proposed activity. A sponsor may choose to engage a person with certain expertise, such as a heritage advisor, geomorphologist, or a Registered Aboriginal Party, to assist in the preparation of a PAHT.
What must a PAHT include?
A PAHT must include the information necessary to establish whether a CHMP is required for a proposed activity. The form of a PAHT is prescribed in the Regulations. A PAHT submitted to the Secretary for certification must also be accompanied by the fee prescribed in the Regulations.
What happens if a survey for Aboriginal cultural heritage is undertaken for a PAHT?
If a survey for Aboriginal cultural heritage is undertaken for a PAHT, the survey must be conducted in accordance with section 34A of the Act. The PAHT application must include the results of that survey, and any details required under section 34A of the Act.
How is a PAHT certified by the Secretary?
A PAHT will be certified by the Secretary if the conclusions are informed and confirmed by the supporting information. The conclusions of a PAHT must include:
- a statement of whether a CHMP is required for the proposed activity
- a statement of whether significant ground disturbance is evident in the proposed activity area and the nature and extent of that disturbance, and
- details of any other action recommended to protect or preserve any Aboriginal cultural heritage in the proposed activity area.
The Secretary may request any additional information the Secretary reasonably considers necessary to make a decision. The 21 day evaluation period ceases to run when the Secretary requests the information and recommences when the information is provided.
Can the Secretary’s decision as to certification of a PAHT be appealed?
There are no appeal provisions as an application for certification of a PAHT is voluntary. Compliance with the certified PAHT decision is mandatory if it requires an approved CHMP for the proposed activity.
Is auguring allowed during a ground inspection for the purposes of a PAHT?
Auguring is permitted if it is undertaken for the purposes of establishing a soil profile, and not for the identification of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
What happens to PAHT’s once certified?
Certified PAHTs will be placed on the VAHR. The Register will only display a PAHT when it is certified.
Is it expected that the certification document will contain all documents that led to it being certified?
Yes, the certificate will be attached to the information contained in the application and will be placed on the register.
If a PAHT needs be resubmitted, do I need to repay the fee?
Yes. A fee needs to be paid per PAHT.
Need Expert Cultural Heritage Support for Your Project?
ACHM is here to help. Call us today on 1300 724 913 or email us for more information.